providing digital opportunities for all
Digital Opportunity Channel logo
OneWorld channel logo
browse stories by topic
browse stories by country or region
advanced search
Top Stories
Events
Poverty
Education
Gender
Health
Environment
Partnership
Governance
Our Partners
Join Us
Partner News
WSIS
Policy Initiatives
Web Resources
Funding Resources
do channel
oneworld
publications
editorial team
contact us


0
0
0

Gender budgeting – an overview

Manish Kumar
Manish Kumar
Within a short period of time, the concept of Gender Budgeting has become a powerful tool for gender mainstreaming. In India also, the government is now making conscious and sincere efforts in this direction as evident from the recent budgetary speech of the finance minister.

Over the past two decades, women’s empowerment has been increasingly recognised as the crucial factor for any country’s holistic and sustainable development. Several programmes and projects across the world have been launched and are currently in progress to bring social, economic and political equity and broader access to basic livlihood needs. Alongside these developments, gender has emerged as an overarching socio-cultural variable considered at par with other factors such as caste, race, class, etc. Gender is not synomymous to women, nor it is a zero sum game implying loss for men and to their status relative to each other (Lopez-Carlos and Zahidi 2005).

Gender inequality is a major concern for all the countries and societies. Promoting gender equality and empowerment has assumed top priority in the development agenda of the national and local governments, corporates, and NGOs. Various agencies of the United Nations also continue to work in this direction. To provide a thrust and clear direction to gender equality initiatives, the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM) was established as a separate fund within the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in 1984 with a mandate to “ensure women’s involvement in mainstream activities”. The concept was expanded to “gender mainstreaming” at the Platform of Action resulting from the 1995 Beijing World Conference on women.

Gender mainstreaming means applying gender perspectives to all the policy, planning, implementation and evaluation activities and processes. The concept of disaggregating government expenditure to determine the extent to which it is furthering or detracting from the achievement of gender eqality, is one of the most powerful tools at our disposal for gender mainstreaming (Morna 2000). This tool is called gender budgeting. Gender budgets are not separate budget for men and women, rather these are tools and processes designed to facilitate a gender analysis in the formulation of government budgets and the allocation of resources.

The information and communication technologies especially those programmes and packages dealing with the quantitative and qualitative analysis are very relevant for gender sensitive analysis of budgets. Given the asymmetrical status of men and women in the society and the economy, no budget line is neutral.The coventional macroeconomic thinking has ignored this obvious reality for a long time and hence overlooked the unpaid work of women which significantly contributes to the national economic growth. In this context gender budgeting offers an opportunity to asses the differential impact of budget on men and women and also to realign the macroeconomic policies and programmes for achieving gender equity in all spheres of life.
manish box

Tools for gender sensitive budget analysis

The various ‘tools’ that can be utilised for a gender-sensitive analysis of budgets, are:

 

  1. Gender-aware policy appraisal: This is an analytical approach which involves scrutinising the policies of different portfolios and programmes. It questions the assumption that policies are ‘gender-neutral’ in their effects and asks instead: In what ways are the policies and their associated resource allocations likely to reduce or increase gender inequalities?
  2. Gender-disaggregated beneficiary assessments: This research technique is used to ask actual or potential beneficiaries the extent to which government policies and programmes match these peoples’ priorities.
  3. Gender-disaggregated public expenditure incidence analysis: This research technique compares public expenditure for a given programme, usually with data from household surveys, to reveal the distribution of expenditure between women and men, girls and boys.
  4. Gender-disaggregated tax incidence analysis: This research technique examines both direct and indirect taxes in order to calculate how much taxation is paid by different individuals or households.
  5. Gender-disaggregated analysis of the impact of the budget on time use: This looks at the relationship between the national budget and the way time is used in households. This ensures that the time spent by women in unpaid work is accounted for in policy analysis.
  6. Gender-aware medium term economic policy framework: This attempts to incorporate gender into the economic models on which medium term economic frameworks are based.
  7. Gender-aware budget statement: This involves an accountability process which may utilise any of the above tools. It requires a high degree of commitment and co-ordination throughout the public sector as ministries or departments undertake an assessment of the gender impact of their line budgets.

 The effectiveness and efficiency of all these ‘tools’ can be greatly enhanced by new information and communication technologies which can cut down the cost, time and human resource required for such analysis otherwise. Besides they can faciliate sharing of these experiences across regions and boundaries.

      Source: www.gender-budgets.org

Siginificance of gender budgeting

Though the concept originated in Australia, a great extent of work has been done in developing countries like South Africa, Uganda, Brazil, Sri Lanka as well. Gender Budget Initiatives (GBI), though still in their early stages of growth, have scored some important successess like the re-prioritisation of expenditure (Philippines), effecting policy changes (Australia), exposing policy weaknesses (Sri Lanka), exposing/ highlighting general budgetary weaknesses and developing economic literacy and participation (Uganda). The experiences from various GBI clearly identify certain factors that are essential for the success of these initiatives (UNDP 2004). Some of these factors are:
  • Involvement of the civil society in long term commitments rather than sporadic activities
  • Building alliances and coalitions
  • Increasing women’s participation in budgetary debates and decisions
  • Capacity building for:
  • - Gender sensitive budget (GSB) advocates familiarity with budgetary process
  • - officials- Gender sensitisation
  • - Legislature - Ability to hold the executive accountable on GSB
  • Larger political changes


Learning from GBI underlines several important steps to be undertaken to strenghten the existing and future GBI. It also provides a guideline for countries like India where GB is in infancy. Some of the important steps are:
  • Systematic evaluation of the impact of gender sensitive budget analysis
  • Identification of country specific methodologies
  • Continued capacity building
  • Continued advocacy/awareness raising
  • Improved networking and knowledge sharing among participatory countries.
  • Continued support for collection of gender-disaggregated data
  • Development of gender-sensitive participatory research techniques to increase grassroots participation


Gender sensitive analysis should lead to gender sensitive budget formulation. It is a challenge of different magnitude. Efforts must be aimed at bringing gender budgeting from the margin to the centre of development by mainstreaming it into participatory budgeting, local governance and decentralisation, poverty reduction and poverty reduction strategy papers and MDG monitoring. The sustainability of GBI is crucial for meeting the goals of gender equality. This should be ensured by promoting different institutional arrangements like governement-CSOs, intra-government, government-NGOs as well as by promoting advocacy at all levels.
“Last July, I promised to consider gender budgeting. Hon’ble Members will be happy to note that I have included in the Budget documents a separate statement highlighting the gender sensitivities of the budgetary allocations under 10 demands for grants. The total amount in BE 2005-06, according to the statement, is Rs.14,379 crore. Although this is another first in budget-making in India, it is only a beginning and, in course of time, all Departments will be required to present gender budgets as well as make benefit-incidence analyses.”
Excerpts from the budget (2005-06) speech of Indian Finance Minister, P. Chidambaram.
Source: http://indiabudget.nic.in/


Gender budgeting in India

The Asia regional office of UNIFEM (based in Delhi) has mooted the idea of gender budgeting by organizing workshops on this issue in different parts of the country (Leadbetter 2004). A number of women parliamentarians are leading debates around the issue at the parliament level. Apart from this a number of studies have been undertaken and some of the recommendations made by them have been incorporated in economic policy documents of the government.

The Union government’s commitment towards gender budgeting is reflected in its recent budget (2005-06). Twenty-two states in India are already implementing gender budget initiatives in their budgets.

Conclusion

The concept of gender budgeting has become a powerful tool for gender mainstreaming within a short period of time. In India also, the government is now making conscious and sincere efforts towards the same, as is evident from the recent budgetary speech of the finance minister.

The South Asian society is characterised by its deeply embedded gender inequalities. Gender budgeting enables various stakeholders engaged in the process of governance to evaluate the impact of budgets with reference to gender equality.

The debate on policy and programmes is worthless if it is not followed by a discussion about money. The sustainability of GBI has to be ensured through the implementation of coherent strategies for policy reforms and concerted lobbying campaigns.

References

Leadbetter, Helen (2004). Gender Budgeting, DFID UK.

Lopez-Carlos, Augusto, Saadia Zahidi (2005). Women’s Empowerment: Measuring the Global Gender Gap, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.

Morna,Colleen Lowe (2000). “Gender Budgeting: Myths and Realities” paper presented at the 25 years International Women’s Politics Workshop, Bonn, 13-14 October 2000.

UNDP (2004). Gender-Sensitive Budgeting, UNDP, 2004.

Author: Manish Kumar is the Manager – ICT Research at OneWorld South Asia.


User comments

"TODAYS WORLD"

Time: 08.09.2005 22:26

Comment: HI FRIENDS I M SRUJAL , I M A STUDENT OF H.L MCA AND I WANT TO TELL YOU PEOPLE ABOUT TODAYS WORLD;

IN TODAYS WORLD MOST OF THINGS DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU ARE MAKING(i.e WHAT

TYPE OF SODTWARE IS BEING DEVLOPED BY YOU AND YOU SHOULD STRICTLY ALLOW

ALL THE RULES AND THINK ALOT ;;;



THIS ALL THINGS WERE FOR INSPIRE NEW CHALLANGERS AND EXISTING ALSO;; SO FRIENDS

BEST OF LUCK FOR YOUR NEW FUTURE





sitemap | feedback | about us | contact us | web accessibility | privacy policy | our sponsors |  

www.digitalopportunity.org